ISO 22989 Revision Checker
ISO/IEC 22989:2022/FDAmd 1 Amendment 1: Generative AI Stage 50.00 Planning date 16 Feb 2027, an estimate 117 defined terms · 23 clause pages

Home / Free check

Nine questions, no account

Check your AI vocabulary

Nine questions about the vocabulary your firm actually uses. The reading comes from the 117 public definitions and the amendment record, not from a score of your firm. Nothing leaves this page. A blank submit, or an answer recorded as not sure, returns scope incomplete rather than a pass.

Do you keep a controlled AI vocabulary?
Does your policy define AI system using a published definition?
Is your AI inventory keyed to those terms?
Is there a named owner for terminology?
Do you map your terms to ISO/IEC 42001 clause 3?
Are you tracking the generative AI amendment?
Do you keep a change log for vocabulary changes?
Do procurement and model providers use the same terms?
When is your next vocabulary review?

The plan works back from the earlier of this date and the planning date, 16 February 2027.

What the reading is, and is not

It is a reading of nine answers against the public terms and the amendment record. It names a starting point, at least three actions and a dated plan. It is not a maturity score, not an audit and not a compliance result. The product does not certify, and no answer is sent anywhere.

Why some answers return scope incomplete

An unanswered question, or an answer recorded as not sure, returns scope incomplete and names the question. The engine does not default an unknown to the lighter pathway, because a reading built on an unknown is worse than no reading.

What happens to the answers

They stay in this browser tab. There is no account, no server call and no analytics event carrying an answer. The plan page keeps its rows in local storage; the check keeps nothing after the tab is closed.

Last updated: 2026-10-21 · Markdown version