ISO 22989 Revision Checker
ISO/IEC 22989:2022/FDAmd 1 Amendment 1: Generative AI Stage 50.00 Planning date 16 Feb 2027, an estimate 117 defined terms · 23 clause pages

Home / Clauses

AI concepts · 5.2

From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI

This section connects the older strong and weak AI distinction to the general and narrow AI terms defined in clause 3. The public preview gives the heading only, so the site explains the two defined terms and does not claim the argument the section makes.

  • concept section (body not public)
  • Clause
  • ISO/IEC 22989:2022/FDAmd 1
  • Last updated: 2026-10-21

What this clause settles

The page is a reading of the published structure and the public entries. It does not invent the body of a clause that ISO has not published, and it does not turn a heading into an obligation. For From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI, the page keeps the claim level "concept section (body not public)" visible and says where the public text stops.

Who it binds

The organisation that adopts the vocabulary. The clause is not a shall requirement; the claim level states what it is.

What to do in your practice

Take the clause into the next governance review with two questions: which artefacts rely on it, and which sentence would a reviewer quote to show the firm uses it? Record the answers as actions with dates. Start with the artefacts that cite From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI and work outwards.

Evidence an auditor or regulator asks for

  • A policy map that names From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI and the clause it comes from.
    Shows that From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI was read and placed, not merely cited.
  • A controlled vocabulary register for the entries in From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI, with an owner and a review date.
    An auditor asks who keeps the From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI entries current, not only whether they exist.
  • One live artefact that uses a term from From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI correctly, with the date it was checked.
    Connects From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI to the work rather than to a shelf document.
Ask your teamWhich artefact in the firm relies on From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI, and who keeps it current?

Common gaps this page catches

  • From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI is cited without the entries behind it, so the citation cannot be tested.
  • The clause is treated as a checklist when it is a vocabulary, and counting terms is not the same as controlling them.

What to prepare before the amendment lands

Take From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI into the next review, list the artefacts that rely on it and give each a named owner. The From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI list is the plan; the owner is the control.

How to test it here

Take one live artefact rather than a template, find the sentence or field where From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI is used, and put this page beside it. Record the answer, the artefact and the date, because that record is the evidence and a glossary entry on its own is only an intention.

What this page does not claim

The page does not reproduce the standard, certify the firm or predict the wording the amendment will use; it states From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI at the claim level "concept section (body not public)" and stops where the public record stops.

Common questions

What does From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI mean in ISO 22989?
This section connects the older strong and weak AI distinction to the general and narrow AI terms defined in clause 3. The public preview gives the heading only, so the site explains the two defined terms and does not claim the argument the section makes.
What evidence should we keep for 5.2?
A policy map that names From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI and the clause it comes from. A controlled vocabulary register for the entries in From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI, with an owner and a review date.
Is From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI a requirement?
No: From strong and weak AI to general and narrow AI is a definition or clause of a terminology standard, and it becomes binding only when a firm writes it into a policy, a contract or a procedure, or when another standard incorporates it.

Related units

Source. ISO/IEC 22989:2022, Clause 5.2. Open the ISO public entry. Retrieved 21 October 2026.

https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso-iec:22989:ed-1:v1:en

ISO catalogue record 88145, the amendment status, stage and dates. Catalogue record 74296, the base standard.

Claim level: concept section (body not public). Heading only.

Built from the public ISO record and the public clause 3 entries. No clause text is reproduced. How the record is built.

Last updated: 2026-10-21 · Markdown version · Check your vocabulary