AI concepts · 5.9
Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI
This section expands the symbolic and subsymbolic split. The public preview gives the heading only. The split matters to generative AI because neural models sit on the subsymbolic side.
What this clause settles
This clause is part of the map of the document. The page states what the clause covers, what the public record proves and where the text stops, so a reader can plan without guessing at the missing part. For Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI, the page keeps the claim level "concept section (body not public)" visible and says where the public text stops.
Who it binds
The organisation that adopts the vocabulary. The clause is not a shall requirement; the claim level states what it is.
What to do in your practice
Use the clause as the index for the vocabulary work. Take the terms it covers, match them to the artefacts where they appear, and record the places with no artefact as the first work items. Start with the artefacts that cite Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI and work outwards.
Evidence an auditor or regulator asks for
- A policy map that names Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI and the clause it comes from.Shows that Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI was read and placed, not merely cited.
- A controlled vocabulary register for the entries in Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI, with an owner and a review date.An auditor asks who keeps the Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI entries current, not only whether they exist.
- One live artefact that uses a term from Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI correctly, with the date it was checked.Connects Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI to the work rather than to a shelf document.
Common gaps this page catches
- Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI is cited without the entries behind it, so the citation cannot be tested.
- The clause is cited in a policy without the terms behind it, so the citation adds authority but not meaning.
What to prepare before the amendment lands
Take Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI into the next review, list the artefacts that rely on it and give each a named owner. The Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI list is the plan; the owner is the control.
How to test it here
Take one live artefact rather than a template, find the sentence or field where Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI is used, and put this page beside it. Record the answer, the artefact and the date, because that record is the evidence and a glossary entry on its own is only an intention.
What this page does not claim
The page does not reproduce the standard, certify the firm or predict the wording the amendment will use; it states Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI at the claim level "concept section (body not public)" and stops where the public record stops.
Common questions
- What does Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI mean in ISO 22989?
- This section expands the symbolic and subsymbolic split. The public preview gives the heading only. The split matters to generative AI because neural models sit on the subsymbolic side.
- What evidence should we keep for 5.9?
- A policy map that names Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI and the clause it comes from. A controlled vocabulary register for the entries in Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI, with an owner and a review date.
- Is Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI a requirement?
- No: Symbolic and subsymbolic approaches for AI is a definition or clause of a terminology standard, and it becomes binding only when a firm writes it into a policy, a contract or a procedure, or when another standard incorporates it.
Related units
Source. ISO/IEC 22989:2022, Clause 5.9. Open the ISO public entry. Retrieved 21 October 2026.
https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso-iec:22989:ed-1:v1:en
ISO catalogue record 88145, the amendment status, stage and dates. Catalogue record 74296, the base standard.
Claim level: concept section (body not public). Heading only.
Last updated: 2026-10-21 · Markdown version · Check your vocabulary