Terms related to natural language processing · 3.6.1
automatic summarization
a task that shortens a piece of natural language content or text while keeping the important meaning
What this term settles
The definition fixes what automatic summarization means inside this vocabulary and, just as usefully, where the boundary sits. A reader who means something wider or narrower is using a different term and should say so.
Who it binds
The entry has no shall in it. Its force comes from use: once automatic summarization appears in a procedure or a supplier term, this is the meaning the reader is entitled to rely on.
What to do in your practice
Use the entry as a test in the next review. Ask the owner to point at the artefact that shows automatic summarization in this sense, then record the answer with a date.
Evidence an auditor or regulator asks for
- A controlled vocabulary entry for automatic summarization with the citation 3.6.1, an owner and a review date.An auditor can check that the term is controlled rather than assumed.
- A product description that names the language task and the input and output it handles.Shows automatic summarization in use in the artefact the firm relies on, not only in a glossary.
- An evaluation set with the language, the domain and the scoring rule.The product description mixes the task with the model, so a change of model reads as a change of task.
Common gaps this page catches
- automatic summarization is used in the language task in the product description without a written definition, so two teams can mean different things.
- The entry exists in a glossary but not in the system record, so the two disagree at the point of use.
What to prepare before the amendment lands
Take the next policy revision and replace the loose use of automatic summarization with the entry and its citation. Record the change in the vocabulary change log.
How to test it here
Take one live artefact rather than a template, find the sentence or field where automatic summarization is used, and put this page beside it. Record the answer, the artefact and the date, because that record is the evidence and a glossary entry on its own is only an intention.
What this page does not claim
The page does not reproduce the standard, certify the firm or predict the wording the amendment will use; it states automatic summarization at the claim level "definition" and stops where the public record stops.
Common questions
- What does automatic summarization mean in ISO 22989?
- a task that shortens a piece of natural language content or text while keeping the important meaning
- What evidence should we keep for 3.6.1?
- A controlled vocabulary entry for automatic summarization with the citation 3.6.1, an owner and a review date. A product description that names the language task and the input and output it handles.
- Is automatic summarization a requirement?
- No: automatic summarization is a definition or clause of a terminology standard, and it becomes binding only when a firm writes it into a policy, a contract or a procedure, or when another standard incorporates it.
Related units
Source. ISO/IEC 22989:2022, Clause 3.6.1, Terms and definitions. Open the ISO public entry. Retrieved 21 October 2026.
https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso-iec:22989:ed-1:v1:en
ISO catalogue record 88145, the amendment status, stage and dates. Catalogue record 74296, the base standard.
Claim level: definition. The definition is in the public preview. This page states it in our own words and does not reproduce the text.
Last updated: 2026-10-21 · Markdown version · Check your vocabulary